Fchth's comments

@_llolittla I don’t want to resort to such harsh examples, but I think this will explain everything more clearly. The fact that he was drunk does not remove his responsibility. Does that mean that if you were drunk, you could do something like this and then claim you’re not to blame just because you were intoxicated

@Nagireobiggestglazer It was around chapter 65. First of all, Isak was heavily drunk. Secondly, he did not give consent to any sexual actions. That alone is enough to call it assault. No consent = SA