Comment by Dalion Heart on Love comes on a Moonlit Night - Chapter 3

Comment on ChapterLove comes on a Moonlit Night - Chapter 3

Wait, so she somehow DIDN'T know that he was a guy, and we're also expected to just laugh off the author putting a child in a situation to see a grown man naked? :| Some Epstein type s*t.

"𝕴 𝖙𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖉 𝖐𝖎𝖓𝖉𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖘.
𝕿𝖍𝖊𝖞 𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖐𝖊 𝖋𝖑𝖚𝖊𝖓𝖙 𝖈𝖗𝖚𝖊𝖑𝖙𝖞.
𝕾𝖔 𝕴 𝖘𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖉 𝖉𝖎𝖆𝖑𝖊𝖈𝖙𝖘
𝕹𝖔𝖜 𝖜𝖊 �

20 Replies

@Dalion Heart it was an accident discovery tho, and I don’t think it was portrayed as being funny. Wtf is up with reading ill intent where there’s none?
@Jk’s gf The f*k do you mean it wasn't portrayed as being funny? It was literally played off for laughs. Exaggerated reactions, funny faces, etc. Any other scene, you would have just as easily pegged it as a comedy scene, but for the sake of your goofy a*s argument, you suddenly have the social skills of a potato?
Slashermaniac
SlashermaniacManga Addict·3 weeks ago
@Dalion Heart Okay, let’s calm down , the intent was not dirty ; it’s a situation that wasn’t meant to happen, that is needed for the plot, and it’s not meant to be read as anything inappropriate. It’s embarassing, awkward, a moment painful to watch, but that’s really all. Plus the nanny was right behind that child, they weren’t alone in a room, and Psyche didn’t stay naked. The scene is also really tiny, not enough material to assume that it’s drawn with ill intent, and no fanservice. No, Lily didn’t know he was a man, because he doesn’t let her take care of him intimately, and he looks and sounds like a woman, as you know. Now, it’s understandable that you might feel uncomfortable/disgusted by the scene, maybe it’s triggering for you and that’s okay, but that's also on you. You can’t hold the author accountable for that. What you can do, however, is skip the scene, so let’s move on, shall we ?
Slashermaniac
SlashermaniacManga Addict·3 days ago
@chocostrawberrymilk I don’t think I deserve the praise but thank you so much you’re really kind ! ❤️
Cokitafria127
Cokitafria127Manga Addict·2 days ago
@Dalion Heart She is 14. When I was 14 I remember walking into the locker room surprised seeing older highschool girls change and shower openly. It is not that deep🫩 you are the weird one for making such a big deal out of a small nudity scene and making it seem like it was done with a sexual/pedophilic intent
Dalion Heart
Dalion HeartMember·1 day ago(edited)
@Cokitafria127 Homie, you're a female who changed in a locker room with girls of the same age in a non-sexual context. THIS put a grown man's erect dripping d*k right in the face of an underaged girl right after he got down dreaming of f**g some other dude. The scene is explicitly sexual. You being stupid and not catching that, does not make that my fault or the situation anything less than exactly what I described. So let's not do the "you're the weird one here" bullshit when by your own admission, you cannot tell the difference. You're either retarded, or a child.
Dalion Heart
Dalion HeartMember·1 day ago(edited)
@Slashermaniac Right, are you going to explain how drawing out a scene wherein a grown man's erect dripping c*ck is right in the face of an underaged girl, right after that man came as a result of f-cking someone in his dream, advances the plot in any way? What was the necessity of that scene at all? What did it progress? What did we learn? What did anyone benefit from the scene? If it doesn't do any of the categories in the examples I just gave, it's an unnecessary scene that was only added to satiate someone's desire to HAVE the scene for the scene's sake itself. This "tiny" scene is a continuation of a larger scene just before it in the previous chapter, in which the character is having s*x. The plot has it happening in a dream, it doesn't f-cking matter all that much when the results of that scene is still on full display in front of a child. Good god, this stupid f-cking line of pro-pedo arguments reminds me of the dream s*x sequence in another mahua in which two grown a*s men have s*x in the mind of a child they're supposed to be curing of a dream-related issue. You f-cking pedophiles will excuse anything to justify pedophilia by proxy, huh?
@Dalion Heart omfg can't you f**g calm down why are you so mad and motivated on pointing that scene as pedophilia. This scene shows the mc's child aide ACCIDENTALLYYYYYYYYYY learning the fact that mc is a man by ACCIDENTALLYYYYYYYYYY looking at his d*k, erect cus of SOMEONE ELSE=AN ADULT that is ml. Now NO ONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE here supports pedophilia as we are ALL reading a story about some twink getting screwed by a muscular man. Twinks look like children themselves so why did you decide to read this? Plus the ml in the cover is actually in his child form, WHY did you decide to read this and then proceed to complain about some delusion you're having by yourself? No one in the comments has pointed out that scene like you did and why do you think that? Maybe bc EVERYONE knows that this scene was obviously NOTTTTTTTTTTT meant to be pedophilia.
Dalion Heart
Dalion HeartMember·1 day ago(edited)
@chocostrawberrymilk

@chocostrawberrymilk Because you r-tards refuse to accept that it's f-cking weird and nasty and puts so many pedophilic implications on the person who WROTE AND DREW THE SCENE FOR MONTHS WITHOUT SECOND GUESSING THE IMPLICATIONS AT ANY POINT! There were an INFINITE number of ways they could have made the aide discover MC's gender, that didn't involve a c-m soaked erect C-CK in her face, you f-ck-tarded idiot. It didn't even have to involve seeing MC's p-nis at f-cking all. Literally have a joke scene where someone else who knows accidentally say it in front of her, have MC openly acknowledge it in front of her by accident, LITERALLY F-CKING ANYTHING ELSE WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN WHAT THEY CHOSE TO PUT TO PAGE! Also, a twink is not someone who LOOKS LIKE A CHILD! A twink looks like a young-looking adult. Young can and often is early 20s. At no point outside of Asia's weird a*s pedophilic culture does Twink imply someone who even LOOKS LIKE A F-CKING CHILD. If you're looking at children and saying "that's a twink," that says more about YOU, you dumb-ss. Finally, don't put your ignorance on me, and don't hit me with a f-cking "argumentum ad populum" fallacy. A majority of the people on this site are either too young to be on here, or too stupid to be allowed to tie their shoes without adult supervision. I don't give a sh-t if a majority of the people on this site are either too young or too stupid to see the issue with the scene. It doesn't change the issue with the scene, it just makes you all look r-tarded.

 

Also, I dropped this sh!t. The only reason I keep coming back, is because you self congratulatory pedophilic r-tards keep posting and I get notifications for it. Stop posting, and I stop getting notifications, which means I stop responding.