He didn't ra** him right? Bcs ra** is forcing someone to have s** with you, even though you don't want too. This is probably more similar to a one night stand. I mean he didn't force him to have s** with him, if he said he didn't want too the top obviously wouldn't have done it right? So I think calling what happened 'ra**' is a bit to much. Ra** is fk illegal, I think he'd actually do something about it if it was really ra**. Or am I in the wrong here?
@Loempia tbh idk because he was drunk so i'd assume it's technically taking advantage of someone under the influence?? but yeah ra** would be a strong word for what happened but i'm pretty sure it was still wrong
@Loempia it's not ra** unless the other party is traumatized or "bothered" by the experience. Our MC does not seem to be "bothered" by the experience so it would be classified as a one night stand.
@Loempia technically if there is no consent then it's ra**. Forcing someone to a sexual relationship while they're under the influence and can't think straight then their consent isn't completely clear either. They're not themselves since they're under the influence of alcohol/drugs/anything else. In real life this would be VERY VERY problematic and please please please don't think it's an appropriate thing to do. This is a story and bl is (sadly) famous for romanticizing these types of behaviors (ra**). Do not believe it's normal or even okay, it's important to réalise that those things are not healthy relationships and that they'd be very very toxic irl. Also irl this is technically ra**. Hope i'm not sounding too condescending i'm just trying to explain :)
@Person sadly it's way too common in bl, i hate it i've dropped so many stories where they act as if ra** is just some normal type of rough intercourse with no consequences (👀 looking at you Roses and Champagne)
@Loempia i dont think its ra** but i think it's at LEAST sexual harrassment, maybe SA, since he did take advantage of the mc not being sober and was the one who actually initiated the s*x. he was definitely in the wrong though.
