@K It was hard when you were disproven, huh? I'm not refuting the author considering the author isn't making any claims here, I'm refuting lies you've made.
Punch drunk love, Semantic error & Wet sand
Comment by Nextinline on K
2 Replies
@Nextinline I had actually started typing to disapprove your lies until i realized all this is basic english and comprehension so i was like huh not my problem because i understand people are dense out there. So a statement that the author made concerning her own work and the work in dispute is irrelevant? See what i mean? You're clearly used to showcasing your stupidity so just do you lol.
@Nextinline Fine let me hold your hand again. 1. AFTER. AFTER. AFTER. I said Ian in the present has not yet received the money he was supposed to get after Jason's death. He has also not made plans CURRENTLY on what he will use the money for. In your comment you CLAIMED Ian was gonna use the money to leave TJ, i was saying that's a LIE because we know nothing for now. It has nothing to do with what we already know about Ian wanting to leave previously.
2. Doyak said it. Take it up with her.
3. Your statement insinuated that TJ had something to do with Ian's drug addiction. That is a LIE because Ian stopped doing drugs for TJ, when TJ cried. So if he did drugs while in the gang, nothing to do with TJ okay?
4. CURRENTLY. I said currently. I read ahead so wait and see Ian changing his mind. TJ says no to Ian going back to the gang by the way.
5. Yes TJ had some selfish reasons but can Ian would have had to pay for some form of protection either way. Two things can co exist.
6. I did not deny this. I said TJ was involved indirectly. Some of you act like TJ held a hammer and smashed Ian's leg himself.
7. This is the funniest one. Does Ian know he's dating and going on dates with Jo?
8. Suit yourself
2. Doyak said it. Take it up with her.
3. Your statement insinuated that TJ had something to do with Ian's drug addiction. That is a LIE because Ian stopped doing drugs for TJ, when TJ cried. So if he did drugs while in the gang, nothing to do with TJ okay?
4. CURRENTLY. I said currently. I read ahead so wait and see Ian changing his mind. TJ says no to Ian going back to the gang by the way.
5. Yes TJ had some selfish reasons but can Ian would have had to pay for some form of protection either way. Two things can co exist.
6. I did not deny this. I said TJ was involved indirectly. Some of you act like TJ held a hammer and smashed Ian's leg himself.
7. This is the funniest one. Does Ian know he's dating and going on dates with Jo?
8. Suit yourself