@SleeplessSerenity to be fair, at that time women were seen as a brood mare. If during that time he didn't touch her, that is very kind I guess.
@Circe_cmc he didn't wanna touch her at all because she was a child and all she wanted was to go home poor girl had no idea what was going on she just knew she wanted to go home and she couldn't. He did his best to accommodate her and to make her happy. Wrong for marrying a literal child yes but right for not touching her. Plus he let her go to him herself
@Circe_cmc actually back in this timeline irl if a man married a girl that young(age of consent was 12,so 12-13 although most woman did not get married that young) they would not touch them till they were 15 to 17. And around this time most woman got married at 15-20 and most gave birth to their first kid between the ages of 18-23.
