@BlLover he doesn't get his genes with adoption. It isn't incest. Adoption is the only legal way to get the last name of your homosexual partner, because homosexual marriage isn't legal there. So, what he means is let's marry.
Also, really now, if they have different birth parents it isn't incest!
@ゲルデスソニャ oow that's good to know. It's just that in other part of the world adoption is also consider as parents,so it could be incest,even if they aren't biologically related.
@BlLover , nah, incest it's only when they are related. Otherwise, why would woody allen have been allowed to marry ris daughter Ans still not be kicked in the a** by every person in Hollywood. Don't answer. It's 1) Hollywood is a p cestpool. And 2) I don't live in Hollywood or I would do that every day, because that's grooming.
But in that case, adopting is non incestual.
Sometimes people adopt the man the only daughter marries, just so it's easier for her to follow societal norm and keep the family name. In case of the family business later goint to her (onsen per example ) or him (factory or other businesses) that would be having a loss of status after changing the name.
In those cases ist *sibling* marriage, but not one person sees it that way, it's another culture than the one most westeners grey up in.
Incase of those same s** adoptions it more to be seen as "i adopt you unto my family name" so the son thing doesnt even come up.
@ゲルデスソニャ woody Allen should have been in jail,not only for incest,also for grooming,but,you know, it's Hollywood and another time,so yeah. But if it was with this actual generation,it would probably not pass. Woody might not be a great example it that case cause he made a song about being in love with a 16yo girl and threatening the parents to runaway with her and that song pass,so... But I understood the context when you told me that it's like a "you'll have my name" thing.