Comment by Hollow222 on Wet Sand - Chapter 88

Comment on ChapterWet Sand - Chapter 88

11 Replies

@Hollow222   This is exactly why people dislike Jo’s fans. Instead of actually analyzing the story, they churn out nonsense like this, pitying their favorite and wishing dеath upon everyone elsepepe sticker
@ShinMoon i have seen a lot more people hating on Jo for no reason, Tj deserves to die after what he did to everyone else? You think killers don't deserve to die? That's your problem, I think they do, if you take ones life you deserve to suffer the same fate, and he's not even trying to change, and Tj fans are ones not analyzing the story, in what chapter does Tj come to Ian(non flashback) to talk? Hang out? Have fun? Casual? And not for s**? A lot of Tj fans(not all) fetishze him, because he's se** and has more s** scenes with Ian, not because he's a nice man, if Tj really loves Ian, he will let him go, even if with someone else, because that's true love, not breaking their leg
@Hollow222 Jo raped an unconscious person. Jo killed someone in an alley, depriving them of any chance to call for an ambulance. Jo shot a tied-up Jamie because of his anger-control issues. And yet you still insist on debating who deserves death? The double standards are hard to ignore
@ShinMoon Author said its wasn't ra**. But at that Tj continued to have s** with Ian when he said no, so ra**. Jo didn't kill him, Ian did, and Jo wanted to protect Ian, and yes, I have a double standard for a serial killer and a person who didn't call ambulance
@Hollow222 Jo watched Ian pass out, yet still chose to take advantage of his unconscious body to satisfy his own desire. Morally and legally, that constitutes rаpe. He also killed a man in that alley and would have done the same to Jamie if he hadn’t been stopped. So Jo is, undeniably, both a rapist and a murderer, no matter what anyone tries to claim. And by your own logic, that should make him deserving of death... though apparently your double standards operate on an entirely different wavelength
@ShinMoon yes. It doesn't, Tj killed innocent people, Jo "killed" someone who stalked him and Ian. So yes, you can't compare the 2 because it's 2 different situations, if someone stalked my loved you better think I'm putting something in their head, because that's protecting.
By your logic Ian and Toby should get together.
But yk, Ian has 2 hands, and Jo x Ian x Tj threesome would be fire
@Hollow222

TJ never touched innocent civilians, and Ian himself said so. You would know that too if you actually paid attention to the story.
Also, Jo tried to kill Jamie while he was TIED UP and DEFENSELESS, not to protect anyone but simply because he couldn’t stand hearing that he was never the one for Ian and never would be.
The conclusion is obvious: your selective moral outrage says more about your biases than about the characters. 

@ShinMoon   I only came back to this bc I wanted to see how it advanced, but I know dam well y'all ain't arguing both sides😭. Don't start arguing over this, cause ain't no one's argument right rn. None of y'all are winning; either party is just as bad as the other. This is exactly why this fandom is so f'd, and idk why every chapter I see this same argument, why this character is bad and saying the other character is better cause he didn't do that, meanwhile, bros is still a bad person regardless if he didn't do what the other character did. No one in this manga is better than the other, omg. Why am I responding if I don't like it? Y'all just pis*** me off, that's all LMAOO. I've never been one to get annoyed over comments, but y'all are ridiculous. This is like arguing why Satan is better than Lucifer, and countering with Lucifer is still a better person
trollface sticker
If I rage baited u with this my fault but this rage baited the flying F outta me
@ShinMoon i reflected on my comment. And I realized something, if you want Ian to be unhappy all more power to you, personally i like happy endings and relationship, like I am in with my boyfriend, if you want to be treated as a toy and always a second choice, I won't argue