Comment by meow on Sativa

@Sativa "I'm saying their trauma doesn't reflect on other Muslims, so yes, it kind of does." and "If you've read all that, and I know for a fact it does." ok first thing you could have done is worded the first part more coherently. for example: "I'm saying the people of gaza's trauma doesn't reflect on other muslims." assuming on the next part you're responding to my remark about mentioning the donations to use to validate youre argument, since it was a few comments down you should specifiy. "so yes, it kind of does validate my argument." the second part, "If you've read all that, and I know for a fact it does" i have no idea what this cr** is supposed to mean, but taking context clues, i can assume that you're saying that if i've read the quaran, and you know for a fact that the people of gaza's trauma doesn't reflect on other muslims, which doesnt make sense because you should seperate those two into longer, more cohesive sentences. the comment could have been better without those two sentences, and the last part of the 2nd sentence doesn't make sense because you are saying that when i do (x) action, you know that (y) information.