Since we have to save the baby and not the mother what if when men have testicular cancer, we'll save the ba*** not the man.
💯I am an EGOIST I hate school. I REMEMBER IT ALL TOO WELL R.I.P NAGI SEISHIRO "Sayonara America, Sayonara New York.... But I'll never say Sayanora to you, Ash...
@ORE WA STRIKA DA sorry but... what????? Men can't have babies. They have sperm, without women's eggs they are useless, same as women's eggs without sperm. But is your point why a baby's life more valuable than a mother's? Cause that's always dictated by the mother, she is the one giving her life so she is the only one that can make that decision. She tells her partner and he/she does what it has to do, and that is the end of it. I never get these people saying the baby wouldn't be happy without the mother... Then why would the mother choose the father? If I decided to have a baby, believe me, I would have it with someone that I know will treat our baby like a king/queen even if I was gone, otherwise I wouldn't have a kid at all. Btw, the real equivalent of your testicular cancer thing is ovarian cancer, not an actual child...
@Serendipity What I meant here is that the actual human-being, who is alive, should be saved. I HIGHKEY dislike those men who doesn't have to carry 9 months and give birth and have an ovary say that the baby's like matters more, they'll be saying its their child to and its 50/50 when they can't even bring the bare minumum when its an unwanted child (no hate to all men btw, js those immature ones). Specially to men who says abortion is not a must, abortion can help teens that got preg early, AND population is already alot for everyone to handle.
