Comment by scarekte on Maisha Anwar Haque

Comment on ReplyMaisha Anwar Haque
@Maisha Anwar Haque this is such a crazy borderline mysogynistic take I can’t even believe you d say that even out of ignorance like?? at what point did you even take from the discussion that the woman they are proposing to him "rolls around in bed"?? Well I’ll answer that for you, you didn’t. You js made up the weirdest unsolicited idea in your little sexist mind which also js so happens to be factually incorrect since historically women to be married in high positions have been known to go as far as to be checked by a doctor publicly to attest to their virginity… and I alr know your js gonna dislike my comment and move on bcuz people like you never learn but ykw thats probably why your literacy is so fried blud

1 Reply

@scarekte For starters, it's misogynistic, not 'mysogynistic' which you've wrote. So before talking about my literacy, you should fix your own. Second, which part of my comment was misogynistic which offended you so much? The southern noble in that meeting clearly mentioned a viscount's daughter who has colorful reputation in high society. What do you think 'colorful' in this context means? Surely you don't think she's a girl who's all rainbow, sunshine and pure, who wears 'colorful' clothes only. I've read enough manhwas and also read historic texts also. So yeah, about that historical facts. First wife of King Henry IV, princess Marguerite de Valos, Mary, Queen of Scots. I can name more for you if you want. There have been many who had hidden babies even before their marriage and the husband and in laws didn't even know about it, those who were in high positions. I have wide known knowledge on history, so yeah, let's not go to the historical facts. And just because someone has a different opinion than you, it doesn't make them weird. I don't know for you but i don't want a partner who has had various partners in bed. If I remained single and virgin before getting into a relationship, I also want a partner just the same. If I had only one ex, it's also acceptable if my bf has an ex. But I'm single and my partner had several partners before me, I wouldn't accept it. It just goes to explain how fickle minded that person is. If a person can't reign in their desire and often indulges in his needs with various people, I consider that they have lack of self control. Not to mention the various diseases that would transmit. To me, s*x is not only s*x but something special. It's a bonding that connects us deeper. But if my man has had various s*x partners before and is having s*x with me, to me it would feel like he's going through the motions. Same work, different body. And I'm also quite possessive. My man is only my man. His hands, his lips, his everything belong solely to me. So to think that man was touched by someone else before, I can't accept that. I'd also be disgusted if his hands, lips touched various women before me. It's a matter of equality. If a woman wants a man who didn't have many women before her, it's normal for a man to want the same thing too. Imagine if the situation was reversed. The ML was a fuckboy who had various partners and the FML was a pure white lily. People would be blowing up over it, saying the ML thinks with his d*k, that the FML deserves better. But since it's a woman, you're attacking me saying my comment was misogynistic. It's just my opinion but I'm not forcing anyone to accept my opinion. I haven't been with various people so my partner should also be the same. I don't want a fickle minded partner who can't keep their pants on. That's what I want. And that's why I said that in the comment. If you support people who have had various partners, sure, go right ahead, no one's stopping you. But don't pull a needle out of a haystack when there's none, 'bud' (not 'blud' which you wrote btw).