Nope. The proof is re ipsa, meaning it's derived from the fact itself that the man cheated. No one cheats innocently. Seduction doesn't translate the responsibility from the seducted to the seductress.
Of course, there are drugs, threats or lies that can be used to make someone "cheat", but those cases are rare, and the one who fell victim to them should provide proof of it. Not the contrary.
Review legend: GAI🏅= READ IT | 5✴️ = Good read | 4✴️ = 'tis fine | 3✴️= on the verge of being shockingly okay | 2✴️ abysmal | 1✴️ = READ IT (your pain sustains me)