@BlueBay congratulations... you played yourself. WHEN. DID. I. SAY. SHE. WAS. STUPID!!! I said she was ignorant which is defined as "someone who lacks knowledge in general or knowledge of a topic" (aka fl), compared to the definition of stupid which is, "the lack of an ordinary level of intelligence (I am hoping you know what the difference between intelligence and knowledge)". Therefore, like I said, if a person does not know $h!t they are ignorant not stupid, ignorant...okay. Which means if the narrator is ignorant and supposed to be telling us what is happening but can't they are now unreliable... okay.
Spoiler!
Also there is no such thing as willingly ignorant, there is only willfully ignorant which just means you have the knowledge but just REFUSE to acknowledge it, that's just an @$$h0le. But back to my point, thank you for proving my point for me with your spoiler; she was kept in the dark, not allowed to know the whole truth, wouldn't you say that is the definition of ignorance and therefore she can't be a reliable source🤔.