@ImAbnormal no cuz I feel you, if they had normal human genitals it would've been less weird.. But for the artist/author to know what animal genitals look like add to the suspicion, especially with Milton or fluffy... Like you need a reference for that..
@nuclear bomb YES YES YES THANK YOU. although animal genitalia itself isn't sexual, especially in art, because sometimes people need to draw animals atomically accurate, including genitalia. Which also applies to giving the characters that gained animal features(reverse anthropology ig), animal genitals, I honestly don't think that part is weird, it's kind of a cool way to play into the plot. But it genuinely feels as if the author is fetishing those characteristics. Like I mentioned, M and K. Which I don't think needs an explanation..🥀 buttttttt yes, I DEFINITELY agree with the human genitals part. Because why are originally human people, gaining animal genitalia, like genuinely, they could've js gained hooves and fur like what 💔💔 I understand fluffy if we used the same logic but it was unnecessary to turn a dog anthro 💔 Guys holy yap omg. Lmk if anything I said doesn't make sense or is explained poorly, I usually forget what I write half way writing the next word
