Comment by Prinzinc on The Revenge of the Soul Eater - Chapter 8

Comment on ChapterThe Revenge of the Soul Eater - Chapter 8
Prinzinc
PrinzincBattle-Hardened·3 years ago
Ch. 8

I 100% agree.  Murderers need to die and that guildmaster's ego just purchased way more consequences for the guild and city than it should have in that circumstance. Trying to buy a cover-up and thinking that the value of another person's life can be boiled down into a single month's worth of labor is absurd and insulting.

Instead, not only should they have excuted the chick, but they also should have invited him back to the guild and fined the rest of the Falcon party for participating with their various roles.

9 Replies

I mean fair point but I do believe that not all murderers are bad some are sometimes good so I don't think they should all die that's too broad

Prinzinc
PrinzincBattle-Hardened·3 years ago

If you don't stop the murderers by killing them off, how do you expect to stop them from killing more innocent blood in the future?  How do you expect other would-be murderers to restrain themselves without fearing the consequences of the act of murder?  How do you expect to protect the innocent?  Incarceration doesn't work and there is no justice in allowing murderers to walk free nor is there justice in forgiving them for an unforgivable sin.

Is that not just murdering other murderers where do you draw the line? And not all murderers are bad there's different reasons why people murder people

Prinzinc
PrinzincBattle-Hardened·3 years ago

Killing is not the same as murder,  Murder is the shedding of innocent blood.  If you kill an innocent, you are no longer innocent yourself.  Murderers are not innocent, therefore you cannot murder a murderer.

Well I love your ideology although what I'm simply saying is that simply saying "killing" all murderers is not going do anything people need to punish rather than just "killing" them 
and as much as you want to say killing and murdering are not the same it basically is because you're killing the person because they made a mistake of taking someone's life

Prinzinc
PrinzincBattle-Hardened·3 years ago

Murder and killing is literally not the same thing in any country's legal code nor historically at any point in human history in any place in the world.

@Kabanerl i agree with you but under the meaning of  suffering that you might as well die like the  king of flies thingy getting eat alive should deserve death punishment at least in my opinion
@Cant cancel me tho protection of another person, protection of their country, survival, protection of ones rights, protection of ones property, to enable their own ideas (the last on May be a bit debatable but there's definitely more reasons to murder/kill other than self defense)