Comment by Red on Sadistic Beauty - Chapter 72

Comment on ChapterSadistic Beauty - Chapter 72
According to me, Minho has got mental issues.

Every time I read that this character deserves to be raped, I wonder if so many people think that people who have psychological problems should be raped. Because they deserve it.

10 Replies

@Red ok he might have mental illness, but who tf told him to go to Doona? HE IS THE ONE WHO WENT THEIR ON HIS OWN WILL. The only time he got SA-ed is when the other dude did that. And you think that is not ra**? You're just obsessed with bl
@Winter

Did I write that ?
He went to Duna and Duna raped him.
He went to Wookyung and Wookyung and Duna raped him.
He went to the bar and the 3 men raped him.
The same.
Always the same. Duna is a rapist. She's a psycho rapist. Wookyung is a psycho rapist. Exactly the same.
And readers judge the victim without knowing his psychological disorders or his background. "Does the victim deserve to be raped ?" Are you all mad ?

@Winter

On a Korean Site (that's a translation and this text in not mine) : "[...] It's because Duna and Woo-kyung assaulted and raped Min-ho, and at least Min-ho can be honest if he's with Woo-kyung. Doona's existence was never a blessing for Minho. It was a mutually toxic relationship. They had to break up quickly. Even if Minho leaned in and ended up with Cheonduna, given Minho's literary obsession, it's highly likely that Minho would have been unhappy with Douna for the rest of his life."

Mutually. There are faults on both sides. But rapes on only one side. I don't mind Wookyung being a rapist as a character: he's the antagonist and it's his role in BL, to be like Sangwoo. But it breaks the character of Duna who would be better off only with Haesol. And BDSM. But her revenge against Minho, ra** instead of BDSM, does not correspond to the image of Duna in the other chapters. And we cannot excuse Duna by highlighting the character of her victim: no one deserves to be raped. It's funny when she kicks him after his slap. But when she persists, it makes many readers uncomfortable.

@Red The fact that they try to paint Duna as a Dom girls breaks completely when she doesn't know his limits... a BDSM relationship is always with consent and still people over here thinks this it's not Minho being r4ped? D*mn we are screwed as an empathic society
@Danny thank you !
Duna almost killed Haesol by strangling him. She has got this desire to strangle which is very present (chapter 23 or when she went to see Wookyung). The only times Duna is truly a BDSM dom is with Gyerin, because practices must be carried out rationally.
@Red Still in any of the so called BDSM relationships she had, she never asked for a safe word nor did aftercare, stuff that is really important for the partner's mental health. Thanks G** Gyerin got out of there, Haesol didn't run with enough advice to open his eyes.
@Winter  he didnt rlly except that bc you can tell in his face he was rlly surprised and daymnn you still say he deserves that? That was grape get over it bc he def didnt wanted it AND THAT MEANS GRAPE educate urself what sa/grape even mean
@Red  you think someone w mental illnesses deserves to be graped?? not his fault if he has any i mean he got anger issues youre js sick bc ur mindset is so dum
@argentisslvt this is not the meaning of what I wrote. I wrote that many readers write in the comments that Minho deserve to be raped (?) while for me, Minho had got  a mental issue (borderline ? Mild autism ? I don't know but there is something and he is alone, without help or family). So these readers, in victim blaming, think that IRL a person who has a mental issue deserves to be raped because of his/her mental issue ? It's quite terrible because in the BL SideStory, readers are looking for extenuating circumstances for a psychopath (his mother is evil) but Minho is a victim, he makes me feel pity and few readers try to understand him.
@argentisslvt I often use the "discours indirect libre" in French and I'm not sure there is an equivalent in English (free reported speech ?). Hence errors of understanding. Sometimes.