Comment by Blvynx on vievie02

Comment on Replyvievie02

1 Reply

vievie02
vievie02Member·3 months ago(edited)
@Blvynx I don't get y'all when frame s*xual violations as something to be seen with "nuance," "flattening events," & we need to remove the concept of victim & perpetrator when it comes to alphas/tops. It's nonsensical. You started framing Su-ah as the biggest victim in this & I had to point out Juhyeok is on the outskirts of society as a recessive omega. You're asking to have cognitive dissonance towards Juhyeok's plight in favour of someone who's revered in their society. Miss me with that.

It's really egregious that you're painting Su-ah as a himbo ingénue yet there's internal monologues of him plotting & scheming to make Juhyeok sweat & wait to get his fix from him. Their deal was pump & leave, yet Su-ah started to go against that. He building his own delusions on someone that has even violently rejected his romantic advances. Since Juhyeok saw the way to appeal to him are activities together, he did the same thing. The emotional dependency is his cross to carry since the other party isn't reciprocating. You're infantalising Su-ah because his soft appearance—he's very aware of every action he's done. The cutesy act is Juhyeok alone & compare that to the icy personality for the rest of class. He knows that Juhyeok doesn't want to be with him anymore & has physical fought him when he breaches his boundaries. Juhyeok is holding accountable for making a recessive omega & him thinking it's a stepping stone is Su-ah's fault. He knows that Juhyeok's economic, physical, & social well-being is on the line but getting his d*ck wet is more important. If someone broke your legs & you have to perform s*xual favours in order get your crutches/wheelchair, who has the stronger leverage?

Yet at the end of the day, he didn't take advantage of him. The other party has taken advantage of every advantage he's gotten. I'm not buying the sweet & demure act from Su-ah. I've seen emotionally stunted tops & his internal monologues shows the contrary.