@ItsNotOverYet He didn't go for him, he went because he had no choice in the matter, it was a political obligation. So technically, no, it doesn't mean anything.
Comment by Nordremo on ItsNotOverYet
2 Replies
@Nordremo technically, yes, you are right of course.
But at the same time, while fulfilling his duty to the homeland, he could treat his appointed “husband” very differently.
The relationship that developed between them then was based on more than just duty (though duties cannot be denied for sure). Beyond devotion to his duty and his homeland, there was a devotion specifically to Shuraka and a desire to protect Shuraka , not just the "husband" and the alliance between the countries.. Otherwise there wouldn't have been 10 years of prayers.
In short, what I'm trying to say is that he showed up there "in he**" against his will both times. But the first time, he volunteered to defend Shuraka. I think that's how it will be now, too.
But at the same time, while fulfilling his duty to the homeland, he could treat his appointed “husband” very differently.
The relationship that developed between them then was based on more than just duty (though duties cannot be denied for sure). Beyond devotion to his duty and his homeland, there was a devotion specifically to Shuraka and a desire to protect Shuraka , not just the "husband" and the alliance between the countries.. Otherwise there wouldn't have been 10 years of prayers.
In short, what I'm trying to say is that he showed up there "in he**" against his will both times. But the first time, he volunteered to defend Shuraka. I think that's how it will be now, too.
@Nordremo he would ...always