@just.a.random.person but it's still pretty weird. If it's okay for minors to be shown in a s3xual light, then it's going to be normalized. Do you think it's okay to find 16-17 yr olds s3xy when you yourself could be older than them? It's like shipping characters from animes and making p0rn0graphy of them. The thing is, they're younger than these guys. They are like 15-16, but would you still find that okay? They may be fictional characters, but that doesn't change the fact it's weird and for some grown people to get their freak on. Imagine you're a child, be it 15-17, and someone gets mad when they can't see what you have in your pants. Get your morals straight because being fictional doesn't make it right. And it sucks because a lot of people think this way when in reality it's really bad because it can spiral to actual people who may be minors. Don't be one of those people.
@Bunne then it's a choose made by the author. But I doubt they'd be in highschool still. 17-18 is for 12th grade, which is where I assume they're at. If they were 19, they would've been brought back a grade which would've made no sense considering how intelligent they are. I'm not completely sure, I may be wrong but even then it's not like we need to see their dcks. They're in highschool so we shouldn't be expecting anything.
@DirectDerecho in chapter 2 he says he's 19 and it's perfectly normal to be 18-19 in the last year of highschool. I'm just saying they're not kids so it's just a choice of the author to not show it but not cuz they're underage (they defo aren't)
@Bunne then that explains it. I won't have to argue about it any longer if they are of age. So we all have to agree it's a choice and that we won't get disappointed because then I'd have to go into another talk about sexualizing 🗿(I'm tired of talking 😭😭😭)