Since he was drunk, couldn't consent and remember what he was doing. It's safe to say that he was r@ped. I hate when authors do this because why can't I read a consensual scene with the two main characters?! Anyway, as long as both don't try to take advantage of each other and they both have a healthy relationship with each other after that then it's fine. (Not the r@pe, just the aftermath)
Comment by Transy on Player <3 Player - Chapter 26
8 Replies
I was curious. In this case it was the top who's drunk and the bottom was conscious. is it still called raped?
@Transy raped is when someone being FORCEFUL, be it when he drunk or sober... he's the one that coerced and manipulated doori to have s** how come Doori's the one raped him? U dumb or what? A drunk person can ra** too, you seems to ignore that. Irl, there are a lot of victims who were raped by a drunkard.
@Transy I know this comment is two years old, but it's one of the few times I've seen someone on this hellsite actually point out how needlessly slimy scenes like this are... Characters ignoring each other's consent/ boundaries ("No"s, "Stop"s, "Wait"s, etc., etc.) is so normalized in this genre and it's frustrating to no end. Would it have killed the author to have two characters mutually consent???


