Comment by Teacats on SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS

Comment on ReplySIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS
@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS

 Once again putting words in my mouth, I didn't say "Your Username is Sigma skibidi slicers, ergo, your argument is not tautological." or anything similar you dunce, what I said was "Your kind doesn't even have common sense, much less logic." Was this directed towards you in general? Yes. Are you the sole person referenced by my words? No. It's either you're really narcissistic or just plain stupid. No matter what I say you've focused on the wrong parts of it and still managed to misinterpret them DESPITE focusing on them.

Point out where I directly stated "You have no logical reasoning with your take" oh yeah, that's right, you CAN'T point it out because I never said that. What I said was "Logic is reason, and what you said wasn't reasoning with me or trying to dispel any confusion you mave have caused with your take on what I said." Did I say you have no logical reasoning wh your take in that sentence? No. I never criticized your take in the first place, what I criticized was what your username is and how people with those types of usernames act. Even if you try to twist what I said, what I stated was a fact anyways. It is true that your response to my response was one made with no intention of reasoning/explaining anything. No matter how much you misinterpret it, it will remain to be the truth. 


Also what I did was not an Ad Hominem since to begin with. It was directed at you in a broad sense but at the time there was no "argument" or "debate" happening, thus making it a normal insult. You don't even have a proper argument to begin with, you've just been clinging onto the coattails of my words and trying to make an argument (though not a good one) out of that.

One day I'll kill myself lols

"Tell me you fool, if I continue to regress... Will I ever get to meet you again?"

Birthday — Jul. 14 🎉

1 Reply

@Teacats Holy sh**, It has been eight months since I've used mangabuddy and also 8 months since the beginning of this whole shenanigan. Anyways, I've reread our whole argument and goddam is your reasoning bad, and icl my reasoning was bad also, though I bet on my whole allowance that my belief is right. Looks like I'm playing the devil's advocate once again.... BWAHAHAHAH!!

Ok first of all, you're going circular. What do I mean by this? you were the one who first started missing the point. When I commented my analogy, you in g** forbid you to be in a debate. red herred my point, saying "People with brainrot humor have no common sense let alone logic."

But ok, I do get your point here, you aren't trusting my argument here, but simply dismissing it just because of that? that's a different story. First of all calling me stupid just because I have some humor doesn't justify that I'm stupid, like you're seriously trying to use stereotypes to justify your belief that I'm stupid? How hypocritical of you. That reasoning per se is hasty generalizing me with stereotypes sounds kinda sounds ike humor-racism to me(do you get the term of this idiosyncrasy? I hope you do, since you just gotta use the entomology to find the pieces.), and also which by the way is fallacious. But let's say you only meant the general people who has this humor and you can have exceptions, however sadly that puts us back to hasty generalizing me, and If you say that you didn't refer me then that means there's no reason to doubt my analogy right?