Comment by Teacats on Drawing: The Greatest Mangaka Becomes A Skilled “Martial Artist” In Another World - Chapter 1

@Teacats (Fast reader here) So I actually got past ch5 and I have to admit it... I was wrong, this series isn't "eh"... It's fuçking trash. 

All in all, it's bad. Future readers shouldn't waste their time on this. It's Boring, it's Cliche, and that's only in the first handful of chapters. This is not getting any better. Go read something else. 👍

@Teacats by this logic, Rudeus is not a pedo😭😭😭 thats a crazy logic bud💀🙏🙏

@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS  Huh? I don't read Jobless Reincarnation so idk what you're talkin about, secondly don't put words in my mouth little bro 🤠 Thirdly, I don't want hear nothin' comin' from "Sigma Skibidi Slicer" 💀 Your kind doesn't even have common sense, much less logic.. 🙏

@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS  Huh? I don't read Jobless Reincarnation so idk what you're talkin about, secondly don't put words in my mouth little bro 🤠 Thirdly, I don't want hear nothin' comin' from "Sigma Skibidi Slicer" 💀 Your kind doesn't even have common sense, much less logic.. 😭🙏

@Teacats But that's where You're wrong, just because my nickname is Sigma Skibidi Slicers, doesn't mean I'm not very Used to logic, in fact, I'm quite familiar with logic, You name it: Deontic logic, Intuitionistic logic, Epistemic logic, doxastic logic, Nomological laws, temporal logic, athletic modality, Deductive reasoning, Conductive reasoning, analogical reasoning, Inductive reasoning, predicate logic, Propositional logic, Boolean Algebra, and fuzzy logic, the list goes on.

Just because someone is ret*** doesn't mean someone lacks deduction skills, Common sense and Logic is a disjunction.

@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS  No, you lack logic. Instead of saying things like "I have logic, I'm familiar with logic, & I use logic." Like the brain dead chronically online NEET that you probably are, you should've just... USED IT. Logic is reason, and what you said wasn't reasoning with me or trying to dispel any confusion you may have caused with your take on what I said. Even if you were a logical person that doesn't dispel what I said, since I said "your kind" in a broad sense, indicating that ANYONE/PEOPLE IN GENERAL who/thatfinds humor in this "skibidi toilet" generation Alpha potty humor is not logical.

Your only takeaway from my response was that I said last, and you focused on that. instead of trying to prove that you've got brains by explaining how you got that take from what I said, you gave me a pitiful excuse of a response—that was probably A.I generated—where you made baseless claims with no evidence to back it up.

@Teacats Then why did you say I have no logical reasoning with my take, your latter refute didn't even attack my argument, instead you ad hominem our dialect to invalidate the criticism of your axiological ethic. **"Your Username is Sigma skibidi slicers, ergo, your argument is not tautological."** In what form does it invalidate my argument? Your attempt of refuting me commits Genetic fallacy.

@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS

 Once again putting words in my mouth, I didn't say "Your Username is Sigma skibidi slicers, ergo, your argument is not tautological." or anything similar you dunce, what I said was "Your kind doesn't even have common sense, much less logic." Was this directed towards you in general? Yes. Are you the sole person referenced by my words? No. It's either you're really narcissistic or just plain stupid. No matter what I say you've focused on the wrong parts of it and still managed to misinterpret them DESPITE focusing on them.

Point out where I directly stated "You have no logical reasoning with your take" oh yeah, that's right, you CAN'T point it out because I never said that. What I said was "Logic is reason, and what you said wasn't reasoning with me or trying to dispel any confusion you mave have caused with your take on what I said." Did I say you have no logical reasoning wh your take in that sentence? No. I never criticized your take in the first place, what I criticized was what your username is and how people with those types of usernames act. Even if you try to twist what I said, what I stated was a fact anyways. It is true that your response to my response was one made with no intention of reasoning/explaining anything. No matter how much you misinterpret it, it will remain to be the truth. 

Also what I did was not an Ad Hominem since to begin with. It was directed at you in a broad sense but at the time there was no "argument" or "debate" happening, thus making it a normal insult. You don't even have a proper argument to begin with, you've just been clinging onto the coattails of my words and trying to make an argument (though not a good one) out of that.

@Teacats Holy sh**, It has been eight months since I've used mangabuddy and also 8 months since the beginning of this whole shenanigan. Anyways, I've reread our whole argument and goddam is your reasoning bad, and icl my reasoning was bad also, though I bet on my whole allowance that my belief is right. Looks like I'm playing the devil's advocate once again.... BWAHAHAHAH!!

Ok first of all, you're going circular. What do I mean by this? you were the one who first started missing the point. When I commented my analogy, you in g** forbid you to be in a debate. red herred my point, saying "People with brainrot humor have no common sense let alone logic."

But ok, I do get your point here, you aren't trusting my argument here, but simply dismissing it just because of that? that's a different story. First of all calling me stupid just because I have some humor doesn't justify that I'm stupid, like you're seriously trying to use stereotypes to justify your belief that I'm stupid? How hypocritical of you. That reasoning per se is hasty generalizing me with stereotypes sounds kinda sounds ike humor-racism to me(do you get the term of this idiosyncrasy? I hope you do, since you just gotta use the entomology to find the pieces.), and also which by the way is fallacious. But let's say you only meant the general people who has this humor and you can have exceptions, however sadly that puts us back to hasty generalizing me, and If you say that you didn't refer me then that means there's no reason to doubt my analogy right?

But again, if you think I'm misunderstanding your point, then let's say you were simply assuming that I'm dumb because well, I have brainrot humor. However that also is fallacious, Cuz brother you're literally shifting the burden if that's what you meant, you're basically saying "people with humor like you are stupid, why should I listen to you? Prove to me that you're not stupid," or thing along those lines. Which is funny because instead of debunking my analogy which I probably would've just let this under the bridge, if you did so. But Nooooooo~~ you choose to be skeptical and asserting that I might be stupid because people with humor like me are stupid, in which case is appealing to probability and hasty generalization by itself, and to make It worse you tried to shift the burden of proof to me which I'm literally the victim of your statement, and by the rules of debate those that assert something must be the one who must prove his very own assertion. So you were the one who need to prove that I'm stupid and I have a lack of logic all along. Not me, which by the way I'm also guilty of, since I've failed to address this, but thankfully I've gotten quite better and I'm more less affected to pressure. But anyways, shame on you, man. You really tried to debunk me with hot garbage reasoning and justification. Your argument isn't even a valid, let alone a sound one.