Comment by Angel dust on Approximal Guide - Chapter 15

@Angel dust huh, why? He doesn't look nor acts femine at all, so why do you call him baby girl? 🤨 He is quite strong mentally and physically, so I honestly don't get it 🤔 I read hundreds if not thousand BL during my life and in some of them bottoms were so feminine that they basically were girls (appearance and character wise) just with tiny d!cks. But this MC is so not that, quite the opposite actually.
Or you are calling him babygirl because of his character temper? 🤔

@Blalalaika I'm sorry if it came off that way I meant his appearance lol. Like in his post life babygirl isn't the word I'd use for him, but this new appearance is babygirl. And yeah the temper tantrum too. Anyhow it wasn't meant to be an insult? I don't know why anyone would think babygirl is meant to be an insult???

@Angel dust well this art style in general is pretty "rough",so even in this body I wouldn't call him exactly babygirl, but compared to how other guys looks...I see what you mean 🤔 Anyway, I'm sorry if my comment came of a bit of aggressive, I sometimes get ticked off by people, who fetishize BL aka they must make bottom as feminine as possible, otherwise they can't proceed. They can't comprehend such things as muscled bottom, feminine looking top or switch couples 🙄 You mentioning that MC is babygirl, looked to me like you were kinda trying to feminise him. Now I know it was not the case, so sorry about that 🙇

@Blalalaika Even if the other person tried to feminise him, what's the problem here? "Babygirl" isn’t an insult

@Charlie kirk   read and re-read again, if needed, my above comment, I already explained what I meant and why.

@Blalalaika The issue here is you're getting mad at "Angel dust" for calling him a babygirl as if it is an insult by default. It came off as associating male characters with girls or femininity is inherently degrading. The issue here is you making feminization equals disrespect. You're bringing same heteronormative stereotypes that you may or may not against.

@Charlie kirk listen, I already apologise to Angel dust for misunderstanding her comment, so why are you still butting in? Feminization is not a problem by itself, it's female readers/watchers of BL, who feminize guys, who are bottoms. Those females hate seeing muscular bottoms or feminine looking tops. They hate switch couples too, because they can understand gay relationships only as equivalent to straight relationships: one must always be in female role aka bottom, another one male role aka top, bottom must look weaker, smaller than top, top always taller, more muscular than bottom and so on.

@Blalalaika You just did the same thing in reverse mode. What you’re talking about is a real issue, just don’t go around harassing people who are trans, femboys, or feminine gays or whatever. Peace.

@Charlie kirk I think I sorted things out with Angel Dust, but then you came to bu** in and cause trouble. It's you, who should stop harassing people just because you're bored or have some other issues 🥴

@Blalalaika You may not know but this is is a public space and I can comment anywhere I want. If me "bu**ing" in annoyed you, you could just ignore it but you didn’t, which is fine. I don’t see where tf I harassed you, so stop being a victim. 

Btw, nice pfp