Comment by Warrior on Il_bello_dei_panda

Comment on ReplyIl_bello_dei_panda
@Il_bello_dei_panda well, killing doesn't gives justification because I have seen in the movie of Spiderman where Peter tries to kill green globin in there but other variants of Peter stops Peter. I don't remember what they say at that time but I know that they are consequences of killing person which we suffers and our surroundings also suffers like friends and family will have emotional and financials damage. Also, that's the reason today laws were created to stop people killing and in some countries for raping even without action of father that man gets dead. Well, if that man lives freely outside without getting dead penalty also not even going to jail in simply language he doesn't gets punished for his crime then  That father killing that man doesn't need justification. Also, the thing people wants to be right is right for us because others put it that way or we were taught that way. In simple way killing a cockroach is good job why because people hate it and killing a butterfly is bad job why because people like it. But that people are collecting dead butterflies like a collection piece then people praise him. It is called peers pressure in another language you can search in Google or anywhere. Our mind simulation what's right and what's wrong by following other people.
Time is all thing and all the things are time

1 Reply

@Book To explain my point of view I must first make a premise, I live in a state where the death penalty does not exist. I agree with this choice because I find it hypocritical that a state that condemns murder bathes itself in the same guilt, by killing the criminal. It is easy to say that If someone killed someone close to me I would be satisfied to see him rot in prison but I am sure that if it happened I would not be able to think that the punishment is fair, but I would like him to be killed too, probably though, if this happened, that person would become a victim and the people close to him would seek revenge and so an infinite circle. Because hatred always generates more hatred. Theoretically speaking the best solution is prison. The problem however arises when the perpetrator is neither accused nor incarcerated but is free to live normally, you said that then a person would not need justification to kill him, but I do not think that is the case, because the moment you kill him you automatically become guilty. Murder, although in some cases it makes us doubt it, is never the right choice.