Comment by OAO on CressentM00n

Comment on ReplyCressentM00n
@CressentM00n I am responding to you—since I did write about judgment in my comment—just so there will be no misunderstandings. I wrote that I will postpone my judgment (and therefore my opinion) not because I don't have one, but because I don't want any arguments to happen. I never actually said what my judgment was. So, if you wrote that part taking my comment into consideration, please understand that I never said whether this is right or wrong; I just wanted to avoid discussions or insults from people. If it wasn't about my comment, then you can just ignore this.

2 Replies

ItsNotOverYet
ItsNotOverYetChat Legend·15 hours ago
@OAO Thank you for your reply. I read your CressentM00n's comment and wrote a question only because I was wondering what was the right (or acceptable) way to do this, and whether there was a right (acceptable) way. I couldn't find an answer for myself on how to do this in a way that would be appropriate for others, so I left a comment with question.
@OAO I'm not sure what you comment is but I'm sure I will find it soon but you said you will hold onto your judgment but can I just say something(I think I will say something). Yes let's say, don't judge a book by its cover, what we can judge so far is the setting ( makes no sense) and the love interests. So far it has started out as the classic white savior, who didn't like slavery and he was a good slave Master and yadayada...wrong! Secondly this is clearly during the slavery Era yet still we are having cow boys? The timeliness don't match up, nothing. If Jaxx really put effort into his research and understood what actually happened. I'm about 80% sure that they would have canceled the idea and stuck to a cowboy theme. WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN PERFECT BY THE WAY! Just those few things I pointed out alone clearly shows the inconsistencies and lack of actually effort put into studying such a heavy topic