all your arguments are basically "he did it to protect her so it's ok". By that logic any random stalker who does something they see as "protecting" their target without taking into consideration their feelings and decisions as if they're a 4yo without a say in it is also ok to you.
The mental gymnastic you're doing just to justify the actions of a guy who is called OPPRESSOR by the author in the literal title of the story is simply baffling, but you do you pal.
@behind a dumpster oh g**. They are in battlefield here, we are talking about Frontline where she can get bombed any second. And if he had a choice to move her to safer side, why not? Why do you think their is a only one right answer here? Anyone would "protect" someone they know if they can, when they know the person was literal suicidal if just a months ago. If you read what I said completely instead of blankly replying it just as mental gymnastics, Like I said, what he here isn't a complete wrong decision. What type of perfect choice are you stuck upon dear?
