Comment by Omniscient Reader on Prinzinc

Because that is the outcome of your suggestion as you singled out women with your statement.

Also, if you are suggesting that both men and woman shouldn't have behavioral standards and duties, then that's an even faster way for society to completely crumble.  There are a LOT of things that you can do that are currently legal which can make other people's lives miserable and you can't even make new laws to stop those behaviors if you can't at least cooperatively say as a society that you have certain behavioral expectations and duties that people ought to fulfill.

Honestly, I'm against making new laws for things which we can accomplish if we simply put social pressure on people instead.  That way, most people will follow the social pressure and those who don't won't be arrested or anything like that for deciding to do something else.  In your suggestion, we lose all ability for social pressure on people to accomplish anything and therefore are ONLY left with the law as a vehicle to force behaviors while you simultaneously break your ability to pass new laws.

No matter which way you go with this, it's only worse.  I gave you the benefit of the doubt as I assumed that you were proposing the least disruptive and apocalyptic version of this.