The problem is you are seeing just one victim and that's the son you barely understanding a parent victim phase to his trauma and why psychologically his actions do makes sense even if not very justified. Infact I find the son more in fault cause clearly a man suffering 10 years of trauma, like he literally sav with bare eyes his wife being gobbled away by the sea amd how the rest of the village over the past years is just continuously feeding his guilt again and again, with that da** environment you raise a son alone who grows up telling you again and again he will go to the sea body, he will get his mom back ... Are you seeing how badly he is also at the end feeding his father worst trauma and fears? It's great he wants to retrieve his mother's body or want to proof the fake superstition but why th will u say it to a man who is the most against it and the most traumatized? Is he still a naive kid to fail to understand the psychological stand of his father's health? And on top of that not only he goes he returns late and again starts to feed the same trauma again and again omg seriously...bruh as psychology student u don't know how much it pis*** me when a own family members doesn't understand their family members point of trauma and what to mention what to not , his actions literally shows he is a stubborn child bare to no understanding of father and obviously zero idea of communication. Lastly obviously that man got totally feared, he obviously balmed him that another of his failure will cause his son life to and in that environment he did whatever he find could stop his son from a suicide act. And then the son is suddenly the only one victimised while u guys totally ignore the fact of how continuously his father was mentally victim both the present act of son to the past trauma and carry on to call his a****** and u telling me it makes sense and he deserves it bruh? Touch biased over kid but nothing to a parent huh?