But again, if you think I'm misunderstanding your point, then let's say you were simply assuming that I'm dumb because well, I have brainrot humor. However that also is fallacious, Cuz brother you're literally shifting the burden if that's what you meant, you're basically saying "people with humor like you are stupid, why should I listen to you? Prove to me that you're not stupid," or thing along those lines. Which is funny because instead of debunking my analogy which I probably would've just let this under the bridge, if you did so. But Nooooooo~~ you choose to be skeptical and asserting that I might be stupid because people with humor like me are stupid, in which case is appealing to probability and hasty generalization by itself, and to make It worse you tried to shift the burden of proof to me which I'm literally the victim of your statement, and by the rules of debate those that assert something must be the one who must prove his very own assertion. So you were the one who need to prove that I'm stupid and I have a lack of logic all along. Not me, which by the way I'm also guilty of, since I've failed to address this, but thankfully I've gotten quite better and I'm more less affected to pressure. But anyways, shame on you, man. You really tried to debunk me with hot garbage reasoning and justification. Your argument isn't even a valid, let alone a sound one.
“If Mercy to the skibidi toilets, is Cruelty to the Cameramans. Then Justice to the Cameramans is Cruelty for the Skibidi toilets.” —**Adam Rizzler.**
