Comment by SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS on Teacats

Comment on ReplyTeacats
SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS
SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERSMember·1 year ago
Ch. 1
But again, if you think I'm misunderstanding your point, then let's say you were simply assuming that I'm dumb because well, I have brainrot humor. However that also is fallacious, Cuz brother you're literally shifting the burden if that's what you meant, you're basically saying "people with humor like you are stupid, why should I listen to you? Prove to me that you're not stupid," or thing along those lines. Which is funny because instead of debunking my analogy which I probably would've just let this under the bridge, if you did so. But Nooooooo~~ you choose to be skeptical and asserting that I might be stupid because people with humor like me are stupid, in which case is appealing to probability and hasty generalization by itself, and to make It worse you tried to shift the burden of proof to me which I'm literally the victim of your statement, and by the rules of debate those that assert something must be the one who must prove his very own assertion. So you were the one who need to prove that I'm stupid and I have a lack of logic all along. Not me, which by the way I'm also guilty of, since I've failed to address this, but thankfully I've gotten quite better and I'm more less affected to pressure. But anyways, shame on you, man. You really tried to debunk me with hot garbage reasoning and justification. Your argument isn't even a valid, let alone a sound one.
“If Mercy to the skibidi toilets, is Cruelty to the Cameramans. Then Justice to the Cameramans is Cruelty for the Skibidi toilets.” —**Adam Rizzler.**

1 Reply

Teacats
TeacatsMember·1 year ago
@SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICERS @SIGMA SKIBIDI SLICER... Bro wtf are you on about... Please tell me you're joking atp.

First of all

Not once have I directly called you stupid over your humor, what I said was "Once again putting words in my mouth, I didn't say "Your Username is Sigma skibidi slicers, ergo, your argument is not tautological." or anything similar you dunce," due to the fact that I found you partifularly foolish when you seemed to claim that I said something that I did not. I also said the line "It's either you're really narcissistic or just plain stupid." referencing the fact that you tried to use my words of "Your kind doesn't even have common sense, much less logic." and make it seem like it was an Ad hominem when 1.) I said it before the debate/argument even started, meaning it was just a normal insult. 2.) You seemed to imply that you were the SOLE person targeted by my words initially when you were not, because it was a mass generalization, hence the quip about narcissism.

IF I wanted to say you were stupid for your humor, I would not use terms like "common sense & logic." Before you say anything, YES, I do know that common sense can be used to refer to intelligence, however in this case, when paired with the word "logic" it is clear I am referring to the "sound judgement" part of the definiton. If I was truly attacking your IQ the word I'd use would be "rational," with the implications leaning heavy on the "knowledge" part of the definiton. What I HAVE said and implied, was that people with brainrot humor, or just a majority of people with brainrot humor tend to argue horribly and make awful points. In the beginining, you were directly responding to what I implied, but then you shifted it to me calling you stupid over your humor somehow, which I have not done throughout this whole debate/argument.
Back to Teacats