@Jonghoseok I feel like the reason why his son hates/blames him is because his dad is an alcoholic which alcoholics usually harm the people around them. Which it can effect the son and in the next chapter, it's in implied that his dad has done this before. Like I said before, you can feel bad for him but don't use the "what in the world will expect from a father psychological stressed for over 10 years" "Just imagine the utter fear during that time the father must suffered" because that is reason why I'm thinking that your excusing his behavior. When you look at both sides, the father does have trauma from his partner's death and he uses alcoholic to cope with trauma while the son is understandably upset at him for locking him up even though that he is an adult and should make his own decisions. And when he told his dad (who is drunk) about his mom, instead of listening to him, he yells at him, hits him, and locks him in a room with no means to escape. With that in mind he is an abusive alcoholic dad, he may have good intentions in mind but doesn't mean that he is in the right. His dad is not a victim for abusing his son, he's only a victim when he was at his wife's death. I am saying this as a emotionally and physically abused victim.
Comment by Transy on Jonghoseok
1 Reply
@Transy ever seen cases where a victim suffering from any psychological disorder wether ptsd , dual personality etc never receive the actual common punishment of crime but are mostly send of to mental asylum for treatment. Cause in this cases the person is blind over the fact of consequences and is doing action only based on a motive resulting of a trauma or disorder which can be both healthy and unhealthy. Their is a reason why I said his actions as general are no where to justify on which u don't even make a point to debate on me cause I already have said that clearly. The further I added was to not call a father suffering from ptsd and disorders names like as****** and literally cursing him on which u are blindly having ur own believe that I am siding against his son when I am clearly saying that "both are victims" no where is his son also correct over his blunt actions over a mentally unstable person, and no where is the father also correct for turning alcoholic and not being a good father which practically in his case does make sense why is he failing. I will stand on my psychological based points because clearly u can't take that man at a same position with someone who is actually healthy with life doing actions that are actually abusive. If you still believe even with his case and all this basic psychological practical sense he is being abusive that's your opinion and I will have my opinion that his actions are rough but his motive is towards fear and protection and not a typical abusive thing done to harm a child, and I don't need you to call me over on it as excuse because atleast I am siding and viewing both person in more of practical and logical sense studying overall and not just biased based on actions.