Comment by and then they fuc*** on _

Comment on Reply_
@_ ok let me get this right, if you're not trying to justify ml's actions, what exactly are you trying to explain in that whole a$$ paragrath? Because the commenters who "point fingers" as you put it, aka those who say ML's actions aren't justified so he's still trash, DO admit how shi*** Anette's father was and how everything was better if he was dead. So yes, revolutions are hard, the rich aren't the one to be pittied. I 100% agree with this. And so? Who exactly treated Anette as a toddler or how is she to blame in anything? HOW is she guilty for her father's actions? In reality she would either be killed off to avoid another uprising or married off so that royal blood keeps flowing in next generations. But this is NOT reality and that is the man who is supposed to love her and spend her life with (Male fuc**** Lead) so there are certain expectations from him: aka, NOT abuse FL to the point of su*cide just because of how she was raised.

1 Reply

_
_Member·1 year ago
@and then they fuc*** the point is that this story is so much more complex than he's bad, and she's good. If you lot wanted black or white stories, I would've directed y'all to Saving My Sweetheart. I've never said that y'all were wrong to blame the ml whose name I don't even recall, just that I'm sick and tired of yapping abt Anette being an angel. She wasn't "couldn't help she was born rich" "couldn't help she was sheltered". She had privileges (that her ppl were sacrificed for) that weren't put to good use because she didn't care to do so. She wasn't a passerby. She's not "caught in the crossfire". She's a god**** royalty. The people's hatred of her wasn't unfounded.

Just say y'all have never stomach-ed anything more than a generic bedtime story "she fell first, he fell harder". This is so much more complex than that. Neither she nor the ml were saints and if y'all can't understand that much, then leave. Dw, no one will miss y'all in these comment sections.