Lets just relate this to reality, so to everyone that is saying it's rap3 let me ask you this. If you are drinking and you got drunk and the you have a crush on kisses you what would you have done?
Wouldn't you guys return the kiss? You guys know that once your drunk and your kissing one thing is gonna led to another and you guys have s3x. Are you people saying that when you wake up in the morning after everything that has happened you would say he rap3d you.
You guys know that if a guy kisses you and you kiss him back he is going to take it has you giving him consent, so why are you people saying he rap3d him? He didn't rap3d him, Hosik could've said no to the s3x just like how he said he wanna go home.
Stop saying he rap3d Hosik, cause he kinda gave Sunbae consent.
Comment by Gabby on Hosik's Story - Chapter 54
6 Replies
guy*
Finally!someone said it
Yes but even tho he liked him he was not in his right mind at the time. And he didn't even bother to ask Hosik whether he was in pain or not (either way mo** fuc*** him without any preparation).
And any sane person should know better than to try to get it on with a drunk.
And the "kinda" consent Hosik gave is rlly bad and if sunbae wasn't already giving any psycho vibes , with him constantly tracking Hosik and stalking him everytime , yall must be blind.
Even the author shows how devastated Hosik was after it since he clearly regretted it afterwards BECAUSE HE COULDNT REMEMBER HIMSELF GIVING CONSENT CUZ HE WAS DRUNK.
The fact tht yall are confusing this with
a one night stand is sad.
And what's even sadder is tht you guys think it's ok to force "consent" from a drunk person.
There is reason why drug tests are done on ra** victims. It's for proof tht they were not in their right mind during it and were possibly coerced into it.
Which is exactly what sunbae does and coerces Hosik when his mind isnt able to differentiate reality from a dream he is probably having with his crush.
Also the fact tht he does it without protection is even worse. What if he has any STDs and gives it to Hosik? Not using condom with a drunk person makes the situation even worse cuz normally it might end up making the person pregnant (irl a woman) or give them life threatening STDs like AIDS.
So no taking consent from a drunk person isnt actually considered consent
I'm someone who has actually experienced rap3 three times and this doesn't look like it, that still was a form of consent even if you're a little out of it when I was 9y it happened to me for the first time and he was basically 20y I was half-sleeping I didn't notice until the second time that I really wasn't dreaming then it happened again with my grandfather but he was (drunk) and I was scared as he** 13 years old ok all I could do was wait until he left to do or tell anyone about it then the last time was when I was 14 a strange boy tried to touch on me in middle school but these whole experiences traumatized me so still till this day I'm scared of men that's why I read yaoi and bl gives me a new image of boys and men.
To: @Bruh
I'm not say consent from a drunk person is actually considered consent, but what I'm trying to say is that Hosik didn't exactly get rap3d. Like come on Sunbae is a guy, if they kisses you and you kissed them back they're gonna take has you giving them consent especially if it's with someone they really like.
And to @watari
It's not a good experience to get rap3d especially by the people whom are supposed to protect you and at such young ages too. Umm I know they were very traumatizing times for you and I would know cause I almost got raped by my own cousin although he was drunk but um anyway I really hope you can get over these experiences and have a wonderful life without being bothered by these experiences?. Continue to move forward and for being strong?.
It still may not be legal consent if it's done/agreed upon while one of you is intoxicated (depends on the law what legal consent is) bc generally, being intoxicated means that your decision making capabilities are impaired.
And it depends for r@pe too. The legally classification of r@pe tends to depend on the law and circumstances, but most require intent by the person, which usually means that they know they don't have consent and still commit the act.
But intent is put into also question if the person is also intoxicated (bc their decision making capabilities are impaired) or reasonably believed they had consent. And technically, if both parties are intoxicated, depending on the law, it means both parties lacked the ability to consent and both could charge the other for r@pe (tho, both would likely lose their case bc there's also a lack of intent from both parties for r@pe charges to stick in that case).
It'd be best for everyone to check what your laws say abt consent, r@pe, etc.
And this is only on the legal side of things. Your laws may not match what you feel abt these topics morally/ethically/personally.