An Actual Gun
An Actual Gun's comments
12 comments
Haha thanks! And yeah I got a little frustrated seeing how ignorant a lot of people here seem to be when it comes to kink practices, despite constantly reading stories that are full of them, so I'm trying to help in whatever way I can. I guess they just usually see it as men/tops being naturally dominant over women/bottoms, which is... pretty saddening to think about. If one of the characters can't push the other one over by force, they suddenly 'can't picture' how the dominance works or smth. Smh my whole da** head.
Glad I could help tho! 
Although she could also just have been a grown woman with the real kind of dwarfism from the context of everyone treating her like an adult, which... wouldn't have been that weird tbh?
Oof, rip your original comment. Completely agree tho, tbh! I wasn't expecting a level-headed convo out of this but hi, pretty much same experience lol. I larped as an adult and it seemed to dissuade the creeps. And yeah, the kids are super bad at online safety rn, because barely anyone's teaching them about it anymore beyond saying 'here is a phone'. Literacy rates are getting really bad across the board too
But yeah idk if insightful is the word I'd use, though ty for the compliment, I was big mad at the time lol. I think you can be whoever tf you want to be online, and if you're 13 and reading prawn, like... why would you signpost that for everyone to know? Your social persona isn't who you are - it's a curated image you maintain, like a boomer with their lawn and picket fence. I should be ignoring them as you say, but when you're reading fetish stuff like this that seems to understand BDSM and occasionally feel the urge to check the comments, it gets more and more depressing each time you see just this... chorus of squawking, illiterate-sounding vanilla people flooding in to complain that the story isn't what they wanted. But yes, they don't discuss in good faith, so I get that it's pointless to engage on some level.
Remember when tumblr allowed prawn? I sure as he** wasn't gonna send them an ask telling them to stop being gross after gooning to it myself like can you imagine the entitlement 😭
sort of, but it's more like masochists like pain, sadists like hurting people. It can be emotional hurt, like humiliation, or even just getting a thrill out of laughing at someone. I know you're a minor, so I'll make this brief and aim for informative (hopefully that comes across?)
Dom and sub are a separate thing from maso***** and sad***. It's just that stories are mostly written with characters as sadistic doms and masochistic subs, so then people write more stories like that bc it's all they know. Irl, dominant masochists are totally a thing, where they want to tell people how to hurt them and praise them for doing it well. Submissive sadists want to be told how to torment somebody, or get praised for doing it well. You can also be sadomasochistic, where you enjoy both giving and receiving pain, and those can also be dominant of submissive. Basically, everyone's different!
People just almost never write stories about these kinds of people, because they don't map 1:1 with sexist ideas about how men and women should act around each other, which then got carried over into BL and gay media. We need better rep for this in general. If I said anything you think is inappropriate, I'm sorry.
Good stuff! And da**, look at how fickle the people replying to you are too. gross asf honestly. acting like they only started looking at (let's all sigh for censorship) prawnography or having smexy thoughts the second their pure pure brains crossed the magical 18yr threshold that unlocks your sexuality or something.
teenaged minors have ho*** thoughts, and clearly a lot of them here read BL. There's nothing gross about acknowledging that, though I don't love the tone. They literally are putting sh** like which dommy man from BL they want to get 'attacked' by in their bios, and are here reading 20 chapters worth of dubcon (let's all sigh for censorship) prawnography. There is a huge demographic of people that read BL to self-insert as the bottom getting ravaged by the top, and calling them out for turning into two-faced, hypocritical puritans the second the prawn isn't about a man assaulting a woman... Good. Say it louder for the people in the back! Stories aren't going to become what you think is 'normal' just because you keep screaming for it to change.

(also omg they never tried using mouth or fingers like A did, so he couldn't get off... this has layers.)
nah, this is furry monsterboy stuff and you're fine to keep liking it, if you like furry gay harems. It's literally fine.
Zoophilia is for real animals, not fictional people with animal traits. pretty much how it works is that anthro characters with human-level intelligence could consent, whereas non-human animals cant, and that's why you shouldn't do it. bc it'd be assault by default.
Lotta people seem really confused, so let me break it down for the baby gays and vanilla beans:
1. the 'weird art style' is just geikomi combined with manhwa. As in 'gay comics' in Japan, aka 'bara' (but don't use bara, it's sorta a slur). Big, soft muscles, lots of fluids, THE CHONK... it's a different art style to BL in general, and made for qu*** men. Look up geikomi if you're unsure.
3. this is obvs a kink BDSM manhwa with a dom protag - he's super caring and observant, finds pleasuring others satisfying, and takes no sh** from anybody. Total dom, no questions. the 'ra**' is a stand-in for the kind of BDSM things that everyone would be consenting to do irl. if you like this, look up how to keep yourself safe in BDSM before you do any of it so you don't hurt yourself or others.
4. there is a (big and manly) assload of gay bdsm references in this. The vests the animal people wear are just bulldog harnesses (look it up), the mits they wear are like pup mits. the dog man is a walking pup scene in general. he's also head submissive, meaning he's above the other subs but not a dom, and helps manage scenes.
5. you can like vag*** and not be into feminine bodies. you can like di** and not be into masculine bodies. it's a spectrum.
6. I doubt the author is a woman because of the above, but if they are, she really knows her stuff when it comes to (specifically) gay men and what they like, in which case, she's a treasure. The gaze in this is pure qu*** man (gay/bi/whatevs), not to say that some women don't also like it.
7. it literally said 'human rights violations', 'futanari' and 'drugging' on the first page. c'mon, I know you guys aren't this bad at reading.