@Ashanna Hensley (Ren) They are children who are being manipulated by adults. The fact that you think that such young kids have the ability to not get manipulated but also to stay composed when provoked ect.. is crazy to me. The only reason why she can is because she's an adult trapped in a kid's body. We already saw multiple times in these kind of stories that the FL also does bad deeds because she's manipulated by her family, yet she gets a second chance and start a revenge. Why can't these kids get a second chance too ? Thinking it's okay to kill them off is evil.

@Helonidas Her dad deserves it, however the kids don't. They are kids and if they change, they deserve a second chance, just like the FL when she got sacrificed.

@Helonidas Her dad deserves it, however the kids don't. They are kids and if they change, they deserve a second chance, just like the FL when she got sacrificed

@i'm a bottom I totally agree with you. What bothers me is people in the comments asking for blood, from kids that as of right now, are innocent and manipulated

@R The second chance is for the MC — but it’s not just about survival. If it was only about revenge, she could’ve resuscitated in someone else’s body and started over from afar. Instead, the story puts her right back in that same house, around the same people — because it’s not just her chance. It’s a test for everyone.

No one said what they did was forgivable — especially the sacrifice. But this timeline gives them the chance to either change or prove they’re still monsters. That’s what makes it powerful. It’s not about forgetting. It’s about seeing who they become.

If they make the same choices again, then fine — burn it all down. But if they don’t, that says something too. You don’t have to agree, but calling people “sick” for wanting more than blind vengeance is just lazy. Conversation over.

@R Vansis didn’t know the snake was poisonous. He’s cruel, yes, but he’s also a child in a new timeline who hasn’t repeated that mistake.
No one said to forgive them — just not to judge this version of them before they’ve even had the chance to make a choice. If they hurt her again? Then sure, let them face the consequences. But condemning people for things they haven’t done in this life defeats the entire point of a second chance story.
This convo’s clearly going in circles, so I’ll leave it at that.

@R No, I didn’t forget that they sacrificed her. That’s exactly what makes this second timeline so important. In that life, they were monsters — yes, even the siblings. But you’re missing the point: they haven’t done it yet in this one. That’s the whole premise. She reversed time — and now, she gets to choose what happens. So do they.

@R Also, he did NOT know it was poisonous, it was clearly said by the guard.

@R You keep bringing up what happened in the past timeline, which was horrifying — no argument there. But this isn’t that timeline anymore. That’s the whole point. The moment time reversed, everyone started fresh — including the abusers. That doesn’t mean we forget what they did. But holding children accountable for actions they haven’t even committed yet? That’s not justice — that’s vengeance without thought.
She’s not the same powerless girl anymore. That alone already changes how people act around her. Vansis is changing. The sister hasn’t insulted her. They’re confused kids now — being fed lies and pushed by a corrupt adult. It’s fair to hold people responsible when they choose cruelty. But when they haven’t even had the chance to make the same choices? That’s just bloodlust disguised as justice.

@haraan kazim Oh no, not the dreaded character motivation and plot development! Can’t have that in a story, right? G** forbid the brother or father were actually manipulated and not just cartoon villains from the start — nope, let’s just burn the whole family tree to the ground and call it a day. Who needs logic or nuance when you can have pure, unfiltered rage?
It’s wild how some of y’all demand complex stories but then throw a tantrum the second a character isn’t 100% evil with no backstory. If she doesn’t rip everyone to shreds regardless of the actual circumstances, you’re “annoyed”? Maybe give the story a chance to tell itself before deciding the ending needs to be a murder spree.

@R So just to be clear — you’re tired of redemption arcs in a story literally built around a second chance? You do realize the main character herself is alive right now because the timeline was reset, right? She’s reclaiming her life, not going on a killing spree. Not everyone deserves forgiveness, sure — but you’re acting like every single person, even kids, should be slaughtered with no regard for who they are now. That’s not justice, that’s just bloodlust with no thought behind it. Vansis is a child. He hasn’t done anything yet. But by your logic, we should just kill him off for what another version of him did in a timeline that technically doesn’t even exist anymore.
If you want every story to be pure revenge with no nuance, no growth, no exploration of morality, then yeah — maybe this isn’t the story for you. But don’t act like authors are doing something wrong for writing actual character development. That’s called plot.